The framework
This is the working vocabulary of Master Storytelling. Open a box to see its packs, then click any card to turn it over for a short explainer.
How to read this page
Master Storytelling is offered as a tool to be used and tested in experience, not a doctrine to be believed. Its deepest claim, that Value is a real feature of reality and not a human projection, is held as an open abductive hypothesis: the best available explanation of what we find, and defeasible if better evidence arrives. Much of the framework, including Integral Motivation Theory and the VMP diagnostic, is designed to stand on its own whether or not that hypothesis is true. Where a card states the realist claim, read it as the framework's working hypothesis.
The strip along the bottom of each card shows three things: the job the concept does, where it works, and which part of the VMP triad it works on.
See
Helps you notice what is going wrong.
Explain
Shows why it happens.
Act
Something to practise or apply.
Guard
Keeps the framework honest: its limits, and how it could be wrong.
A filled icon means the concept works at that scale. An outline means it does not.
Person
In one person: how they perceive and what moves them.
Group
In a group: a team, an organisation or a community.
Culture
Across a whole culture and the story it shares.
Reading it
Here, person is active; group and culture are not.
There are always three circles. A coloured circle means the concept mainly works on that primitive. A blank circle means it does not.
Value
What matters.
Motivation
What moves us.
Purpose
Where we are heading.
Reading it
Here, the concept works mainly on Value.
Each of these is explored in depth in the training.
2 packs · 12 cards
Open the box
2 packs · 15 cards
Open the box
3 packs · 21 cards
Open the box
2 packs · 12 cards
Open the box
4 packs · 24 cards
Open the box
Pack 1
The three primitives of meaning-making, and the diagnostic tool built from them.
Value, Motivation and Purpose: three primitives that work as one system. A tool for seeing what drives a story, a campaign or a culture, tested in use.
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
The triad is the framework’s core diagnostic. Any act of communication carries an implicit answer to three questions: what matters, what moves us, and where we are heading. The three shape one another, so a change in one shifts the others. The triad is offered as a tool to use and test in experience, not a theory to accept on authority.
Role: Explain
The quality of something mattering: felt as a weight, a resonance, a call. On the framework's working hypothesis, a real feature of reality, not a projection.
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
Value is what we encounter when something matters to us in its own right. The framework distinguishes the experience (felt mattering) from the realist claim (that what is felt is really there). The realist claim is held as an abductive hypothesis. Value is prior to motivation and purpose: they respond to it, they do not produce it.
Role: Explain
What moves us to act. It can be driven from outside (pressure, reward, fear) or drawn by what we perceive as worth acting for.
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
Motivation is our response to what we perceive. IMT maps it on two axes: how far a motivation has been made our own (internalisation) and whether it is oriented toward Value itself (telic orientation). Avoid describing motivation as “energy”: the framework speaks of perception and response, or of the mode in which things matter.
Role: Explain
The direction of action. Extrinsic purpose is a target or outcome; intrinsic purpose is a source, a calling, a way of participating.
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
Purpose is the governance primitive: it decides what everything else is subordinated to. When purpose serves Value, outcomes follow from fidelity to what matters. When purpose takes over, Value becomes a means to a target. Purpose can also outlive the value-encounter that grounded it: see Severance.
Role: Explain
Value (capital V) is what matters in itself. Values (lower case) are the priorities a person or culture holds. The two are easily confused.
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
Schwartz’s values are measurable priorities: security, achievement, benevolence and so on. Value is what those priorities are trying to track, or fail to track. Keeping the two apart resolves a recurring confusion: a culture can hold strong values while being badly disordered in its relation to Value (see Order of loves).
Role: Guard
The configuration of Value, Motivation and Purpose carried by a message, practice or culture. It shapes which values feel real.
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
A VMP code is the triad in a particular arrangement. Its effect is on salience: the configuration shapes which values feel real and pressing, while Value itself remains prior. This is why the same issue can feel urgent in one framing and empty in another. Codes are broadly extrinsic or intrinsic, and can be aligned or misaligned.
Role: See
Pack 4
How VMP codes behave: the two orientations, what happens when the primitives align or clash, and what accumulates over time.
The question that sorts every VMP code: is Value serving the outcome, or is the outcome serving Value?
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
This is the axis that carries the framework’s normative gradient. In an extrinsic code, Value is subordinated to a target: care becomes a lever for donations, beauty a tool for clicks. In an intrinsic code, targets are subordinated to Value. The same action can sit on either side, depending on what it serves.
Role: See
Value treated as measurable or acquirable, motivation pushed by pressure or reward, purpose set as a target. Effective in the short term; corrosive over time.
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
Extrinsic codes work: they move numbers quickly. Their cost is cumulative. Each use trains audiences to respond to pressure and reward, and teaches them that what matters can be bought. The result over time is values pollution.
Role: See
Value perceived as real, motivation drawn by that perception, purpose understood as a source or a way of participating. Slower to build; more durable.
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
Intrinsic codes do not rely on pressure, so they rarely produce spikes. They build motivation that sustains itself because it rests on what people perceive as worth caring about. They are slower to establish, but can bring quicker change because they intervene where it matters (see the illusion of pace).
Role: Explain
When Value, Motivation and Purpose share the same orientation, a message holds together. Extrinsic codes can align too.
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
Alignment (previously called “flow”) is coherence between the three primitives: all extrinsic or all intrinsic. Alignment feels right, but it is not a sign of health: a perfectly aligned extrinsic code can be highly persuasive. Avoid calling it “resonance”, which is reserved for telic resonance.
Role: See
When the primitives pull in different directions, people feel it as friction or wrongness: an intrinsic value sold through an extrinsic motive, for example.
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
Dissonance is the felt cost of misalignment. A campaign that invokes love of nature and then uses guilt and targets to move people produces it. Audiences often cannot name what is wrong, but they disengage. Dissonance at scale is linked to polarisation (see the Polarisation Hypothesis).
Role: See
The cumulative cultural damage of repeated extrinsic codes: anxiety, status-seeking, passivity and meaninglessness building up in the atmosphere like pollutants.
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
No single message causes values pollution, just as no single exhaust pipe causes smog. The damage is cumulative and shared. This overlaps with Kasser’s work on materialistic values, which should be credited. The framework’s addition is the VMP diagnosis of how the pollution is produced.
Role: See
Pack 2
The motivation model at the centre of the training: built on the findings of Self-Determination Theory, extended to motivation oriented toward Value.
A model of human motivation that builds on Self-Determination Theory and adds a second dimension: whether motivation is oriented toward Value itself.
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
IMT enters through SDT’s well-established findings and builds on them. Its distinctive addition is telic orientation. Its intervention grammar is object-directed: bring people into contact with what is worth caring about, through attention, beauty and practice. SDT’s grammar is conditions-based: arrange the environment and internalisation follows. IMT can stand as psychology whether or not the realist hypothesis holds.
Role: Explain
The first axis of IMT: how far a motivation has become our own, from external pressure through to fully integrated commitment.
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
This axis comes directly from SDT, from external regulation through introjected and identified to integrated regulation. A motivation can be highly internalised and still be oriented toward an outcome rather than toward Value. That is why one axis is not enough.
Role: Explain
The second axis of IMT: whether a motivation is directed toward Value itself, or toward something else such as a reward, status or a target.
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
Telic orientation runs at right angles to internalisation. It asks what the motivation is finally for. This is the axis where IMT departs from SDT, and where the extrinsic/intrinsic distinction carries its normative weight: what is subordinated to what.
Role: Explain
Motivation directed beyond the activity, toward an outcome, reward or approval. It can be imposed from outside or fully internalised.
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
Extrinsic motivation is not only outside pressure. In SDT, identified and integrated regulation are extrinsic yet experienced as our own. IMT keeps this precision: the question is not where the motive sits but what it serves. A well-internalised extrinsic motive can be the most invisible kind.
Role: See
In IMT, motivation drawn by perceived Value: care, love, devotion, the draw of meaning. Broader than SDT's use of the term.
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
In SDT, intrinsic motivation means doing something for its inherent satisfaction. IMT uses the term more broadly, for motivation that responds to Value perceived in its own right. Name this redefinition openly when working with people who know SDT: it is the heart of IMT’s contribution, not a slip.
Role: Explain
Eight positions across the two axes of IMT, describing how a person is perceiving and responding to Value. Positions and trajectories, not a ladder.
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
The eight positions replace the earlier linear continuum. They describe where someone stands in perceiving Value, not a developmental stage they must climb. People move between positions, and the movement (the trajectory) matters more than the label. Thresholds between positions are a practitioner heuristic, not a structural phase change.
Role: See
The experience of being drawn toward Value. Its structure is tension held in unity, and it appears in three equal modes: the good, the true and the beautiful.
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
Telic resonance is a perception followed by a response. Value does not emit a force; we perceive it and respond. Telic resonance names the whole encounter across three equal formal aspects: agathic, alethic and aesthetic. None is master, and each can be held or captured. Resonance can be counterfeit, which is why it needs the ordo amoris as a test, and why held tension matters (see section 3).
Role: Explain
The innate, trainable capacity to perceive Value before it is filtered through analysis. It can be developed like a muscle, or left to atrophy.
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
Valueception is the perceptual side of the framework. It is what the Synaxis integrates with factual perception. Whether valueception perceives Value or only represents it is the hardest open question in the framework (see The Wall).
Role: Act
Motivation can be in the foreground (what we are aware of pursuing) or the background (the attunement that settles what can matter at all).
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
Mode (foreground or background) is orthogonal to orientation (telic or not). Background operation is not a sign of depth or authenticity: extrinsic grammars also run in the background, and may be most invisible there. Grief shows the background: when a ground is withdrawn, the whole world changes. Use “attunement” or “the mode in which things matter” rather than “energy”.
Role: See
Pack 3
The good, the true and the beautiful are three equal aspects of one encounter with Value. Each holds a tension. Each is captured when that tension collapses, and each, held well, draws us beyond ourselves.
Telic resonance as the good: being claimed by what calls for care, holding competing goods together (justice and mercy, self and other) without collapsing into rule or sentiment.
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
The agathic mode is Value encountered as a claim on us. Its tension lies between competing goods that cannot simply be ranked away. Held, it deepens care: mercy makes justice more just, not softer. Captured, it collapses into moralism or compliance: the rule kept for its own sake, or the comfort of being good. The test: does it turn us toward the other, or back toward our own standing?
Role: Explain
Telic resonance as the true: being drawn to what is, holding knowing and unknowing together. Not mere correctness, but truth that changes the one who sees it.
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
The alethic mode is Value encountered as reality disclosing itself. Its tension lies between precision and mystery: what we can say, and what exceeds it. Held, it brings humility and clearer sight. Captured, it collapses into correctness or data: facts used to win, information without understanding. The test: does it make us yield to what is, or confirm that we were right?
Role: Explain
Telic resonance as the beautiful: depth shining through form, opposites held in one presence. Not prettiness, but what can move us to tears and draw us beyond ourselves.
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
The aesthetic mode is Value encountered as presence. Beauty is not surface pleasantness. It holds opposites together (grief and hope, fragility and strength) so that each is intensified. A poem brings us to tears not because its words are pleasing, but because it takes us out of ourselves: what Murdoch called unselfing. Captured, it collapses into prettiness or kitsch: emotion that returns us to ourselves, moved by our own being moved.
Role: Explain
Intrinsic Value becomes perceptible as claiming us through held tension. Tension does not make Value real; it loosens our grip on ourselves so Value can be seen.
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
This is the tension principle. Wisdom narratives show it: the hero must suffer well for the value they seek to take hold. But suffering is one form of tension, not its definition. Longing, wonder, play and musical dissonance hold tension too, and suffering is never a measure of a person’s worth. The principle is distinct from the Law of Asymmetry, which concerns the cost of realising value, not how Value comes to claim us.
Role: Explain
Tension held in live relation, so that both poles are intensified. Not compromise, where both are weakened, and not stalemate, where they coexist without relation.
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
Integration keeps the tension alive; it does not end it. Compromise trades away part of each pole to meet in the middle. Stalemate leaves both standing side by side, with no need to relate. Like a drawn bow, integration works because the tension remains. Without it, the centre cannot hold.
Role: Act
Ending a tension before it can do its work. The marketing paradigm manufactures tension and then discharges it cheaply: this is the magic solution.
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
Pain-point marketing creates tension (you are anxious, lacking, behind) and relieves it with a product. This works for extrinsic values, which are satisfied by discharge. It fails for intrinsic values, because discharging the tension removes the conditions under which Value claims us. Intrinsic codes hold the tension reality gives long enough for integration to happen.
Role: See
Pack 6
The VMP framework at the scale of a whole culture: what a metanarrative is, where it lives, how it forms, and how it shows itself.
The shared, implicit VMP structure of a culture: the background that settles what can matter, what moves people, and where they think they are heading.
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
A metanarrative is the shared structure of background motivation, described at the level of a culture. It is not a separate thing that causes people’s motivation; it is that motivation’s shared shape. It is implicit and pre-conscious, which is why it is hard to see from inside.
Role: Explain
An explicit, large-scale cultural story such as Progress, the American Dream or Marxism. Told and argued about openly.
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
Grand narratives (Lyotard’s term) are stories a culture tells about itself. Metanarratives in this framework are the implicit VMP grammar beneath those stories. Two cultures can tell the same grand narrative while carrying different metanarratives, and one metanarrative can sit under rival grand narratives. Keep the two terms distinct.
Role: Explain
The attunement that settles what can matter at all, held in common across a culture. It is felt as "how things are", not as a belief.
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
There are two kinds of background. The particular ground is a specific love or relationship. The global ground is the overall attunement that settles what can matter. Metanarrative claims concern the global ground. Lineage: Heidegger on mood and attunement, Ratcliffe on existential feelings.
Role: Explain
A metanarrative is held not only in people but in the practices, institutions and artefacts that keep forming them.
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
Metrics, funding forms, job titles, buildings, apps and rituals all carry VMP codes. They keep shaping people long after anyone chose them. This is why recalibration has to work with materials and institutions, not only with minds.
Role: Explain
The question of how a culture's backgrounds come to share a shape. It replaces the question of how a metanarrative "gets into" people.
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
Because a metanarrative is constitutive rather than causal, there is nothing that has to be transmitted from outside. The real question is formation: which practices, institutions and artefacts shape people’s backgrounds alike, and how.
Role: Explain
Backgrounds become visible when they are withdrawn. Bereavement, a broken social expectation or a cultural collapse each reveals the ground that was holding.
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
Breach works as a diagnostic at three scales: personal loss, interactional breach (Garfinkel’s breaching experiments) and cultural collapse (Lear’s Radical Hope). In each case, what surfaces when the ground goes tells you what the ground was.
Role: See
The practices and cultural technologies that once helped people encounter Value together, many of which modern culture has dismantled.
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
The framework does not claim pre-modern people perceived more. It makes a more defensible claim: that cultures once maintained shared practices for encountering Value (ritual, festival, craft, communal attention) and that many have been dismantled without replacement.
Role: Explain
Being unable to see the lens you think through. The lens becomes invisible and is mistaken for reality itself.
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
Everyone thinks through a paradigm; the trap is forgetting that you do. A trapped paradigm treats objections to it as confirmation of its claims. The framework is not exempt: its own self-sealing risk is why it commits to stated failure conditions (see Testing the framework).
Role: See
The convergence of ecological, social, political and spiritual crises, which share an underlying condition: a breakdown in shared meaning-making and value-perception.
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
The framework’s working position is that an extrinsically calibrated metanarrative and these crises co-constitute one another: each makes the other more likely (Weber’s elective affinity is the nearest model). It does not claim a single root cause, and it does not offer itself as the solution.
Role: See
Pack 7
The dominant extrinsic logic of contemporary culture, and the ways it shows up in communication, campaigning and research.
The dominant cultural logic of extrinsic motivation, magic solutions and transactional engagement. A primary vehicle of values pollution.
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
The marketing paradigm is not confined to marketing departments. It shapes charity fundraising, climate campaigns, education and public policy. Its tools work in the short term, which is why it spreads. The framework’s critique grew from long frontline experience of campaigns that moved numbers but not people.
Role: See
The promise of transformation without cost, or change without inner work. A hallmark of extrinsic purpose.
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
“Ten minutes a day”, “one simple switch”, “change the world with one click”. Magic solutions break the Law of Asymmetry by offering higher value without effort. They are also premature resolution: they discharge a tension that intrinsic Value needs held. Master Storytelling must hold itself to the same test: it is not a magic solution, and should never be sold as one.
Role: See
Fast, urgent, extrinsic campaigns feel quick but slow our response to long-term problems. Values work is slower to build but can produce quicker change.
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
Urgency messaging wins attention now and erodes motivation later. Work on VMP codes takes longer to set up, but it intervenes where change actually happens. Do not describe Master Storytelling or values work as “slow”: describe it as working at the place that matters.
Role: See
What happens when a thick concept is converted into a thin, measurable one: flourishing becomes "wellbeing scores", meaning becomes "satisfaction".
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
The framework’s critique of SDT is a case of translation loss: eudaimonia, a thick normative idea, becomes a functional measure of need satisfaction. The measure is useful. The loss is what it can no longer see.
Role: See
Research shaped by extrinsic codes: rigorous in method, hollow in what it chooses to study and why. Also called hollow rigour.
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
Captured research looks rigorous and often is, in its methods. Its capture lies in its questions: what gets funded, measured and published. Mills’ “abstracted empiricism” is the direct precedent. Use “captured research” or “hollow rigour” in academic settings.
Role: See
When a framework that claims to be neutral carries hidden judgements about what is good. The concealment criterion tests for it.
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
Many frameworks present themselves as value-free while quietly assuming what people should want. The concealment criterion asks whether a framework’s evaluative commitments are stated or hidden. Master Storytelling states its commitments openly and invites them to be tested.
Role: Guard
Pack 5
How people and cultures come to be organised by an extrinsic code, and how to tell the real thing from its imitation.
When the shared background of a person, organisation or culture takes on an extrinsic shape, so that what matters is settled by outcome, status or reward.
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
Capture is not a dissociation from Value. It is a real value-encounter directed at a counterfeit object: the love is real, its object is misplaced. Describe capture as a condition people and institutions come to share, not as something a metanarrative does to them. Agent language (“gripped”, “captured by”) is fine as figure of speech in practitioner settings, never as a claim.
Role: See
Anything presented as valuable that was made without the cost real value requires. We often sense the difference before we can explain it.
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
Mass-produced sentiment, performative relationships and content generated to fill space are examples. Our response to counterfeits shows the Law of Asymmetry at work: Value cannot be had on the cheap. Valueception often detects a counterfeit before analysis can name what is missing.
Role: See
The order of our loves. The pathology the framework diagnoses is not loving unreal things, but loving lesser things above greater ones.
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
The ordo amoris (from Augustine, developed by Scheler) is the framework’s central test for telling true from counterfeit telic resonance. A beautiful lie still involves real perception; what is wrong is the ordering. This resolves the confusion between Value and values, and explains why captured people are often sincere.
Role: Guard
When a purpose keeps running after the value-encounter that grounded it has stopped constraining it. The mission continues; its reason has gone.
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
Severance is a central construct. It explains how organisations founded on real care drift into target-chasing without anyone deciding to abandon the founding value. The purpose still speaks the language of the original value, which is what makes severance hard to see from inside.
Role: See
A false metanarrative supplies its own complete version of the good, the true and the beautiful. That completeness is why capture is stable, not brittle.
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
Capture would collapse quickly if it left people with nothing to love. It persists because it offers a full counterfeit architecture: a good to pursue, a truth to believe, a beauty to admire. Recalibration therefore needs more than critique: it needs a real encounter with what the counterfeit imitates.
Role: Explain
A structural diagnostic: a captured metanarrative can be traced by the forms of suffering it produces and then cannot account for.
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
Where a metanarrative generates suffering that it has no language to explain, that gap is evidence of capture. The criterion looks at structure, not at individual distress, and points the practitioner toward the part of the code that has gone wrong.
Role: See
Pack 8
The faculty the framework develops and the practices that train it.
The innate faculty of meta-aware attention that holds factual perception and value perception together. It sees both the story being told and the VMP grammar beneath it.
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
The Synaxis is an interior faculty, present in everyone and culturally underused. Its name comes from the Greek for assembly, applied here to an interior gathering of perception. It is the pivot point between seeing what is and seeing what matters. Its collective use belongs to the Council, not to the faculty itself.
Role: Act
We attend to the world in two ways: narrowly, to grasp and use it, and openly, to receive it whole. The Synaxis holds both.
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
This draws on McGilchrist’s account of the phenomenology of attention. The framework uses the distinction only as a description of how attention feels and works. It makes no claim about brain hemispheres. Narrow attention is good at facts and parts; open attention is where Value tends to disclose itself.
Role: Act
A facilitated group practice in which people exercise the Synaxis together to surface and recalibrate the VMP codes they share. Coming soon.
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
The Council is a technology for collective discernment, not a debate or a workshop. Participants attend together to a shared practice, artefact or situation and bring its implicit code into view. The Council is part of the practice programme, which is still being tested and trialled.
Role: Act
The movement that defines a Synactic Council: digging beneath what is said to uncover the VMP code that is actually operating.
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
Without excavation, a group conversation is not a Council. Excavation moves from the explicit (what we say we value) to the implicit (what our practices, metrics and habits show we value). It is often uncomfortable, because the operating code rarely matches the stated one.
Role: Act
Intentionally realigning a personal or shared VMP code with Value, so that purpose serves what matters rather than the other way round.
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
Calibration is ongoing, not a one-off fix. It begins with perceiving the current code clearly, then adjusting practices, artefacts and purposes so that they subordinate outcomes to Value. Recalibration at cultural scale works through distributed carriers, not only through persuasion.
Role: Act
A story or piece of work that carries change by provoking, not instructing: it resolves the event but withholds the verdict, and lives inside a practice.
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
Audiences are not taught the framework or the Laws of Value. Instead, a told artefact offers a counter-logical provocation that unsettles the extrinsic code. It brings the story to resolution but leaves the judgement to the audience, and it works best when carried within a practice rather than broadcast alone.
Role: Act
Pack 9
Where "ought" comes from in the framework, and how it protects the person who disagrees.
The "ought" that arises from perceiving Value directly. It is disclosed in encounter, not imposed from outside.
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
When we see something truly worth protecting, the sense that we should protect it comes with the seeing. Intrinsic normativity depends on calibrated perception, which is why the Synaxis matters ethically and not only perceptually.
Role: Explain
Rules, commands and principles imposed from outside by culture, authority or tradition. Useful, but open to capture and to becoming oppressive.
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
Extrinsic norms are not bad in themselves: they carry hard-won wisdom. The risk is severance. When the norm outlives the value-encounter it once protected, it becomes a rule followed for its own sake, or a tool of control.
Role: See
Hume's gap assumes reality is value-neutral. On the framework's working hypothesis, fact and value are perceived together, so "ought" is disclosed, not derived.
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
The framework does not claim to have solved the is/ought problem. It reframes it: if Value is real, the gap is an artefact of describing the world with value stripped out. The reframing stands or falls with the realist hypothesis.
Role: Explain
The framework does not tell people what to conclude. This follows from its own logic: imposed values would turn intrinsic normativity into an extrinsic one.
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
If an “ought” must be disclosed to be intrinsic, it cannot be handed over as an instruction without becoming extrinsic. Refusing to prescribe conclusions is therefore an entailment of the framework, not a stylistic choice. It shapes how training, Councils and told artefacts are designed.
Role: Guard
The right to dissent, understood as faithfulness to Value. Disagreeing with a group, or with the framework itself, can be an act of fidelity.
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
The framework’s anthropology is radically relational, but it preserves personhood, agency and conscience. Dissent is not rebellion or unbinding: it is a person staying faithful to what they perceive. Councils must protect it formally.
Role: Guard
Functional norms say what helps a system work. Categorical norms say what is worth doing. IMT needs the second kind to tell true from counterfeit.
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
SDT can leave metaethics open because its norms are functional: what supports wellbeing. IMT cannot, because it must distinguish real from counterfeit value-perception (the beautiful-lie problem). That is why the framework states its realism openly instead of hedging.
Role: Guard
Pack 10
Four complementary ways of knowing, each with its own domain.
Four complementary ways of knowing, each reaching a different dimension of reality. None replaces the others; understanding needs all four.
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
The framework holds that no single way of knowing has access to everything. Science, lived experience, relationships and normative discernment each see something the others miss. The task is integration: holding them together without letting one overrule the rest.
Role: Explain
Knowing through measurement, modelling and causal explanation. It asks: what can be objectively measured and modelled?
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
The way of science, focused on matter, energy and mechanism. It is one of humanity’s great achievements. Its limit is method, not reality: what it cannot measure, it cannot see, which does not mean it is not there.
Role: Explain
Knowing through lived meaning, felt value and first-person experience. It asks: what is it like, and what matters here?
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
The way of attention to experience as it is lived. This is where Value is first encountered. Its evidence is real but needs care: experience alone cannot tell us whether what it shows is perceived or only represented.
Role: Explain
Knowing through relationships, systems and the coupling of organism and environment. It asks: what relations organise behaviour and meaning?
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
The way of systems and ecology. It shows that nothing makes sense in isolation. It sits close to the Law of Relationality, though relational thinking and value-primitivism use different grounding grammars and cannot both be the deepest category.
Role: Explain
Knowing through discernment of goods, aims and what ought to matter. It asks: what is worth orienting toward?
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
The way of ethics, interpretation and wisdom traditions. It is the way most excluded from modern institutions, which tend to treat it as opinion. The framework treats it as a real way of knowing, open to error and correction like the others.
Role: Explain
Letting one way of knowing colonise the domains of the others: scientism, spiritualism, mechanism, moralism.
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
Each way of knowing becomes a distortion when it claims everything. Scientism dismisses what it cannot measure; spiritualism dismisses evidence; moralism dismisses experience. The framework is not immune, which is why it keeps its ontology in the place of a hypothesis.
Role: Guard
Pack 11
The philosophical ground beneath the framework, and the status it holds.
The hypothesis that Value is a fundamental feature of reality, as basic as matter and energy, and not something consciousness adds to a neutral world.
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
AP is the framework’s ontological foundation. It takes value from metaethics into ontology: Value is not only real for us but part of what there is. It is held openly as a hypothesis, and the rest of the framework is built so that its practical tools do not depend on it.
Role: Explain
AP is held as the best available explanation of what we find, open to revision. Not proven, not a leap of faith, not a wager.
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
The framework commits openly to value-realism rather than hedging. It also refuses to treat realism as proven, or as a choice to live “as if” it were true. Abduction means inference to the best explanation: if better evidence or a better explanation arrives, the hypothesis yields.
Role: Guard
IMT and its research programme can succeed or fail independently of AP. The motivation model does not stand or fall with the metaphysics.
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
Separability is a structural strength. A psychologist can use IMT and the VMP diagnostic without accepting AP. And if AP turns out to be false, the practical tools still stand on their own evidence. Practical success is not used as evidence for AP.
Role: Guard
The human being as one who binds themselves to what they hold as ultimate. Everyone lives within some binding; the question is to what.
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
Homo religans (from religare, to bind) is the framework’s anthropology. It is not a religious claim: the framework rests on ontology, not theology, and is compatible with religious and non-religious lives. It says humans are teleological and relational, always oriented toward something they treat as worth living for.
Role: Explain
The rational, self-interested chooser of economics. The framework does not replace this figure but re-reads it as Homo religans bound to an extrinsic metanarrative.
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
Homo economicus is displaced, not refuted. The model describes real behaviour, but only the behaviour of people whose binding has taken an extrinsic shape. It mistakes one form of binding for human nature.
Role: See
The framework is a web of mutually supporting claims, not a tower built on one foundation. Its credibility depends on the points where it could fail.
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
A coherentist web earns trust only if it faces friction: places where shared perception or evidence could contradict it. The framework names its own self-sealing risk (the faculty needed to judge it is the one it claims to develop) and responds with stated failure conditions.
Role: Guard
Pack 12
The Law of Value sets out how Value behaves if the realist hypothesis is true. Its six laws are working principles, not natural law in the legal or theological sense.
Value acts as a final cause: it draws systems toward greater coherence, complexity and fullness of being.
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
Telos is the “for the sake of which”. In living systems, this is defensible as constitutional teleology: organisms maintain themselves toward their own flourishing. The stronger claim, a telic grain running through the whole universe, is more speculative and should be marked as such.
Role: Explain
The value of anything emerges from its relationships within a wider whole.
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
Nothing has its full value in isolation. A tree’s value includes the forest, the soil and those who rest beneath it. This law guards against treating value as a fixed property that can be extracted and traded.
Role: Explain
Realising higher value takes energy, effort and sacrifice. Value cannot be had on the cheap.
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
This is why counterfeits feel hollow, and why magic solutions fail. It is also a standing check on Master Storytelling itself: promoting the framework must never slip into the extrinsic capture it diagnoses.
Role: Guard
Value discloses itself to receptive attention. Purely analytic knowing cannot capture it.
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
Value is not extracted by investigation; it shows itself when attention is open. This is why practice, beauty and contemplative attention matter in the framework, and why measurement alone always misses something.
Role: Explain
The true, the good and the beautiful are three equal aspects of a single encounter with Value: distinct, inseparable, and held together in tension.
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
The three are formally distinct (after Scotus) but never found apart, and none ranks above the others. Their unity is not sameness but tension held: each keeps the others honest. When one appears without the others, or collapses its tension, something has been captured. This law underpins the agathic, alethic and aesthetic diagnostic.
Role: Explain
Value does not express itself the same way everywhere. It calls forth different responses in different cultures, moments and situations.
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
The law guards against imposing one culture’s expression of Value on another. Unity of Value does not mean uniformity of response. Diversity is evidence of Value’s richness, not of relativism.
Role: Guard
Pack 13
How the framework could be shown to be wrong, and the limits it already admits.
The framework's external check: a pre-registered review of whether practice actually produced what was predicted.
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
The retrospective has two stages. Predictions are registered before practice begins, then outcomes are reviewed against them. It is the framework’s only external validation mechanism, and it tests the practice, not the ontology.
Role: Guard
A public record of what the framework predicts in advance, so that it can be checked against what happens.
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
Most of the framework’s explanatory power is currently retrospective: it explains well after the fact. A prediction register moves it toward prospective claims, which is how a research programme earns its keep (Lakatos’s standard).
Role: Guard
Every claim about practice states in advance what result would count against it. Without this, the claim cannot be tested.
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
A framework that interprets every objection as evidence for itself is self-sealing. Stating failure conditions is the remedy. Until the framework has corroborated predictions of its own, it should not use falsifiability as a weapon against other theories.
Role: Guard
The hardest open problem: experience alone cannot show whether we perceive Value or only represent it through evolved systems.
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
Every line of evidence the framework has explored eventually meets this wall. Felt value could be veridical perception, or a well-functioning evolved system for care and affect. The framework names the wall openly. Its most promising route is directional convergence: the shared kenotic, self-emptying trajectory across opposed traditions.
Role: Guard
That the framework works in practice is not evidence that its ontology is true. Its practical value lies in what it helps people see and try.
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
A framework can be unproven, or even false, and still be an indispensable way of discovering things. The framework’s contribution is its perceptual vocabulary: what it makes visible, and what a practitioner equipped with it would think to try. It does not argue from usefulness back to truth.
Role: Guard
The hypothesis that widespread VMP dissonance drives social polarisation. The framework's strongest empirical claim.
Watch the explainer
Turn over
Needs review
When people repeatedly meet messages whose value, motivation and purpose pull against each other, the friction has to go somewhere. The hypothesis proposes that it feeds polarisation. It is a hypothesis to be tested, with failure conditions stated before results are reviewed.
Role: Explain
A to Z
